- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
GONZALEZ v. KAYE
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Jan 29, 2009
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Defendant claims no prejudice arising from the discontinuance of the action ( see Burnham Serv. Corp. v National Council on Compensation Ins., 288 AD2d 31, 32-33). She contends that plaintiff sought the discontinuance to avoid an adverse determination on defendant's motion for summary judgment ( see e.g. Matter of Baltia Air Lines v CIBC Oppenheimer Corp., 273 AD2d 55, 57, lv denied 95 NY2d 767). However, the record reflects that plaintiff sought a discontinuance on several occasions before defendant made her motion. Moreover, we cannot conclude that defendant would have prevailed on the motion, since, although she sought summary judgment on the merits, discovery was not complete and no depositions had been taken.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.