Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

MARTINEZ v. TORRES

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Feb 3, 2009
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the father's contention, Family Court Act § 413 (1) (a) does not mandate the issuance of minimum orders of child support against indigent noncustodial parents, and as such it does not violate 42 USC § 667 (b) (2) ( see Matter of Jennifer R. v Michael C., 49 AD3d 443; Aregano v Aregano, 289 AD2d 1081).

The father's remaining contentions are not properly before this Court and, in any event, are without merit.