HARRIS v. HARRIS

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court's determination that the petitioner failed to establish that the respondent committed a family offense was supported by a preponderance of the admissible evidence presented at the hearing ( see Family Ct Act § 812; § 832). Where, as here, the Family Court was confronted primarily with issues of credibility, its factual findings must be accorded great weight on appeal unless they were clearly unsupported by the record ( see Matter of Hall v Hall, 45 AD3d 842, 843). Under these circumstances, we find no basis to disturb the Family Court's determination ( see Matter of Kurkcu v Cokyuksel, 31 AD3d 554; Matter of Waaldijk-Howell v Howell, 22 AD3d 675).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.