- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
MARK BRUCE INT. v. ROME
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Mar 24, 2009
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
The exchange of e-mails, which did not set forth the fee for plaintiff's services or an objective standard to determine it, was too indefinite to be enforceable ( see generally Cobble Hill Nursing Home v Henry Warren Corp., 74 NY2d 475, 482-484, cert denied 498 US 816). The standard of reasonableness, left for future determination by the parties themselves, rather than by a third party, was not made objective by the implied duty to determine the amount of the fee in good faith. Furthermore, the unjust enrichment claim was properly dismissed as it is duplicative of the breach of contract claim ( see Andrews v Cerberus Partners, 271 AD2d 348).
[ See 19 Misc 3d 1140(A), 2008 NY Slip Op 51081(U).]
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.