ROONEY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA

EDUARDO ROBRENO, District Judge

AND NOW, this 22 day of April 2009, it is hereby ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum,

(1) the City's motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 76) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;

(2) SEPTA's motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 77) is GRANTED;

(3) AMTRAK's motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 79) is GRANTED;

(1) AMTRAK's motion in limine and motion for leave to file sur-reply (doc. nos. 78, 91) is DENIED as moot;

(2) AMTRAK's motions for leave to file sur-reply (doc. no. 90) is GRANTED;

(3) the City's motion for leave to file sur-reply (doc. no. 93) is GRANTED;

(4) SEPTA's motion for leave to file sur-reply (doc. no. 89) is GRANTED.