Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

D'ADAMO v. ARTUS

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.
Apr 23, 2009
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 70 proceeding seeking a writ of habeas corpus, contending that he is being illegally held due to the Division of Parole's failure to assist with and/or approve housing necessary to facilitate his conditional release. Supreme Court refused to issue the writ and denied petitioner's application without a hearing. Petitioner now appeals.

We affirm. Entitlement to immediate release from prison, which does not occur until the expiration of an inmate's sentence, is a prerequisite for habeas corpus relief ( see People ex rel. Porter v Napoli, 56 AD3d 830, 831). Because petitioner is not entitled to any such immediate release in this case, Supreme Court properly denied petitioner's application ( see People ex rel. Land v State of New York, 54 AD3d 1113; People ex rel. Sansalone v Schriver, 252 AD2d 605).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.