Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

SUPERB GEN. CONTR. CO. v. CITY OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
May 5, 2009
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

No. 497.

Attorney(S)

Agovino § Asselta, LLP, Mineola (Robert C. Buff of counsel), for appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Karen M. Griffin of counsel), for City of New York, respondent. Landman Corsi Ballaine § Ford P.C., New York (Christopher G. Fretel of counsel), for Amherst Rehab Associates, Inc. and Amherst Development Services Corporation, respondents.

JUDGES

Peter Tom

Richard T. Andrias

David B. Saxe

Karla Moskowitz

Leland G. DeGrasse

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

On a prior order ( 39 AD3d 204, lv dismissed 10 NY3d 800), we dismissed the second through seventh causes of action against the City and the entire complaint against defendant S.J. Rehab, under the statute of limitations. That ruling constituted law of the case, precluding plaintiff from raising the issue on the present appeal ( see Clark Constr. Corp. v BLF Realty Holding Corp., 54 AD3d 604; J-Mar Serv. Ctr, Inc. v Mahoney, Connor Hussey, 45 AD3d 809), and plaintiff even conceded as much.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x