Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

COLLEY v. ASTRUE

United States District Court, N.D. New York.
May 12, 2009
DECISION AND ORDER

LAWRENCE KAHN, District Judge

This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on April 20, 2009, by the Honorable Victor E. Bianchini, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 9).

Within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Judge Bianchini's Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 9) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendant's Motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED; Plaintiff's cross-Motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; that the decision of the Commissioner be REVERSED and that the case be REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings consistent with this Report and Recommendation; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.