Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

HUTCHINSON v. FORSTER HOWELL INC

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division.
Aug 3, 2009
ORDER

M. RODGERS, Magistrate Judge

Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS (electronically filed 7/30/2009, doc.9), was referred to the undersigned with the following deficiencies:

Counsel for the moving party shall confer with counsel for the opposing party and shall file with the court, at the time of filing a motion, a statement certifying that counsel has conferred with counsel for the opposing party in a good-faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues raised or has attempted to so confer but, for good cause stated, was unsuccessful, as required by N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 7.1(B).

For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that:

The document shall remain in the electronic file, but the court will not consider it until you have corrected the above deficiencies through the filing of a corrected document. The document is denied without prejudice with leave given to refile after correction.

DONE and ORDERED.