SVINDLAND v. NEMOURS FOUNDATION

MARY McLAUGHLIN, District Judge

AND NOW, this 21st day of August, 2009, upon consideration of the plaintiffs' motions for recusal filed in the above-captioned cases (Svindland Docket No. 192; Daddio Docket No. 158), and the defendants' oppositions thereto, and for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today's date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said motions are DENIED.