Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

JONES v. McDANIEL

United States District Court, D. Nevada.
Sep 2, 2009
ORDER

LARRY HICKS, District Judge

Before the court is Plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate's Order (#18) Pursuant to FRCP 72(a) and Motion to Revoke (#21) and Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Judge's Order Setting an Early Mediation Conference (#26). The court will treat Plaintiff's objection (#21) as a motion to reconsider the Magistrate Judge's Order #18.

Refers to this court's docket number.

The Court has conducted its review in this case, has fully considered the Plaintiff's motion, and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1), and concludes that the Magistrate Judge's ruling was neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law.

The Magistrate Judge's Order (#18) will, therefore, be sustained and Plaintiff's motion (#21) is denied.

Also before the court is Defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Time to file Opposition (#19) to Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (#16) until after the Early Mediation Conference scheduled for September 22, 2009. Plaintiff has filed his Opposition to Defendants Motion for Enlargement of Time (#22). Good cause appearing,

Defendants' motion for enlargement of time (#19) is granted. Defendants shall have to and including Wednesday, September 30, 2009, to file and serve their opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (#16).

IT IS SO ORDERED.