Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. SERGIO DAVID

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Sep 15, 2009
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the verdict convicting him of, inter alia, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, was against the weight of the evidence. In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence ( see CPL 470.15; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor ( see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410, cert denied 542 US 946; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633).