YU v. FAN

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

It is the obligation of the appellant to assemble a proper record on appeal, which must contain all of the relevant papers that were before the Supreme Court ( see CPLR 5526; Matter of Remy v Mitchell, 60 AD3d 860; Cohen v Wallace Minchenberg, 39 AD3d 689; Nakyeoung Seoung v Vicuna, 38 AD3d 734, 735). Inasmuch as the record submitted here by the appellant renders meaningful appellate review of the Supreme Court's determination virtually impossible, we dismiss the appeal ( see Keita v United Parcel Serv., 65 AD3d 571; Salem v Mott, 43 AD3d 397).