Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

MALDONADO v. ALTEMBURGER

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Oct 22, 2009

This is the second action brought by plaintiff to recover damages for injuries he allegedly sustained in a car accident. The first action was dismissed as a nullity, because the person who was named as the sole defendant had died before the action was commenced ( see Maldonado v Law Off. of Mary A. Bjork, 64 AD3d 425). This action must be dismissed because the named defendant is not the personal representative of the decedent's estate ( see id.; Marte v Graber, 58 AD3d 1, 3).

It does not avail plaintiff that defendant did not cooperate with him in his efforts to obtain the necessary documentation for a SCPA 1002 (1) petition for the appointment of an administrator. Plaintiff apparently failed to timely seek a court order to obtain the documentation.