Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. SMITH

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Nov 13, 2009
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed and the indictment is dismissed.

Memorandum: The People appeal from an order granting defendant's motion to suppress evidence seized as the result of a traffic stop. We conclude that County Court properly suppressed the evidence on the ground that the police officer made a mistake of law in stopping defendant's vehicle, which had in fact performed a legal pass on the right pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law ยง 1123 (a) (1) and (2). "Where the officer's belief is based on an erroneous interpretation of law, the stop is illegal at the outset and any further actions by the police as a direct result of the stop are illegal" ( Matter of Byer v Jackson, 241 AD2d 943, 944-945; see People v Smith, 1 AD3d 965; see also People v Gonzalez, 88 NY2d 289, 295-296).