Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

YOUNG v. COVINGTON BURLING, LLP (D.C. 1-28-2010)

United States District Court, D. Columbia.
Jan 28, 2010
ORDER

REGGIE WALTON, District Judge

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Counts II and VII Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Specifically, the component of Count II based on the theory that Covington's non-promotion policy is discriminatory is dismissed as time-barred. Additionally, Count VII of the amended complaint, which asserts a claim of negligent supervision, is dismissed. However, the motion is denied as to the component of Count II which asserts a disparate impact claim based on the theory that Covington's job-assignment policy was racially discriminatory.

SO ORDERED