BREAUX v. PRITCHARD

CARL BARBIER, District Judge

Considering the foregoing Motion to Set Aside Order Denying Motion to Leave Court to File Notice of Appeal [sic] (Rec. D. 18),

In their motion, Plaintiffs ask the Court to set aside an earlier order denying their motion to file an untimely appeal. (Rec. D. 17). However, Plaintiffs' motion is so riddled with grammatical errors that the Court finds it hard to decipher Plaintiffs' arguments.

Furthermore, in order to prevail on a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal, the mover must show "excusable neglect or good cause" to account for the untimely notice. USCS Fed Rules App Proc R 4(a)(5)(A)(ii). Plaintiffs have once again failed to provide the Court with any explanation for their late filings.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Set Aside Order Denying Motion to Leave Court to File Notice of Appeal [sic] (Rec. D. 18) is DENIED.