- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
COZEN O'CONNOR, P.C. v. FISCHBEIN (E.D.Pa. 3-16-2010)
STEWART DALZELL, District Judge
AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2010, upon consideration of the complaint (docket entry # 1), defendant's motion to dismiss pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(3) or, in the alternative, to transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1404 (docket entry # 7), plaintiff's response thereto (docket entry # 13), and defendant's motion for leave to file a reply brief (docket entry # 18), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendant's motion for leave to file a reply brief (docket entry # 18) is GRANTED;
2. The Clerk of Court shall DOCKET defendant's reply brief, which is attached to his motion for leave to file a reply brief as Exhibit A;
3. Defendant's motion to dismiss (docket entry # 7) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART;
4. Defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) and (12)(b)(3) is DENIED;
5. Defendant's motion to transfer this action to the Southern District of New York is GRANTED;
6. The Clerk of Court shall TRANSFER this matter and all case papers to the Southern District of New York; and
7. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this matter statistically.
Alert