- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
STATE v. COMCAST CORP
United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.
Mar 31, 2010
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
ORDER
ANITA BRODY, District Judge
AND NOW, this ___31st___ day of March, 2010, upon consideration of Defendants' Notice of Removal (Doc. #12), Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. #13), Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Remand (Doc. #14), Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. #15), and Plaintiff's Reply (Doc. #16), it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand is DENIED.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.