Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

QUAD/TECH, INC. v. Q.I. PRESS CONTROLS B.V. (E.D.Pa. 4-1-2010)

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.
Apr 1, 2010
ORDER

EDUARDO ROBRENO, District Judge

AND NOW, this 1st day of April, 2010, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 8) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint (doc. no. 92) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for an adverse inference and sanctions (doc. no. 94) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for leave to narrow its claim construction (doc. no. 97) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a reply brief in support of its motion for leave to file a second amended complaint (doc. no. 98) is DENIED.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.