BONAVITA v. McNICHOLAS

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the respondents' motion pursuant to CPLR 3025 (b) for leave to amend their answer to assert an affirmative defense that the action is barred by the Workers' Compensation Law, as the proposed amendment would not cause prejudice or surprise and is neither palpably insufficient nor patently devoid of merit ( see CPLR 3025 [b]; Liss v Trans Auto Sys., 68 NY2d 15, 22-23; Murray v City of New York, 43 NY2d 400, 404-407; Lucido v Mancuso, 49 AD3d 220, 229; Brown v Collora, 278 AD2d 266, 267).

[Prior Case History: 2008 NY Slip Op 32814(U).]