Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. HEARD

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Apr 30, 2010
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon a nonjury verdict, of assault in the second degree (Penal Law ยง 120.05). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that the indictment is duplicitous ( see People v Backus, 67 AD3d 1428, 1429, lv denied 13 NY3d 936), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice ( see CPL 470.15 [a]). Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crime in this nonjury trial ( see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349), we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence ( see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495).