DIPASQUALE v. RONALD

Although plaintiff captioned his motion as one for partial summary judgment, the IAS court correctly held it to be a motion for reargument of a portion of a 2008 order that had granted defendants partial summary judgment dismissing the fourth cause of action. Since no appeal lies from the denial of a motion for reargument, even if not denominated as such ( see Johnson v Fuller Co., 235 AD2d 348), this appeal must be dismissed.