AMOROSI v. MOLINO

LOUIS POLLAK, District Judge

AND NOW, this 2nd day of August, 2010, for the reasons stated in the accompanying opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

(1) Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate the Memorandum and Order Granting Summary Judgment Pending Disposition of Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Settlement (Docket No. 52) is DENIED;

(2) Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Settlement and Renewed Motion to Enforce Settlement (Docket Nos. 72 73) are DENIED IN PART to the extent that the motions seek to vacate this court's summary judgment opinion and are DISMISSED IN PART for lack of subject matter jurisdiction to the extent that the motions seek enforcement of an alleged settlement;

(3) Defendants' Application for Taxable Costs (Docket No. 54) is DENIED; and

(4) Plaintiff's Motions to Proceed with Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Docket Nos. 59 65) are DISMISSED AS MOOT.