Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

HOLLANDER v. ETYMOTIC RESEARCH, INC. (E.D.Pa. 11-1-2010)

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.
Nov 1, 2010
ORDER

PETRESE TUCKER, District Judge

AND NOW, this day of October, 2010, upon consideration of Defendant, Etymotic Research, Inc's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and/or Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) (Doc. 29); Plaintiff/Relator's Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. 35); Defendant Etymotic Research, Inc.'s Motion for Reconsideration to Transfer Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1401(a) (Doc. 31); Plaintiff/Relator Bentley Hollander's Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. 32); and Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Reply (Doc. 36), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and DECREED that Defendant's Motions are DENIED.