Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

SUPANICH v. RUNDLE

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma.
Dec 1, 2010
ORDER

RONALD LEIGHTON, District Judge

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's "Motion for a New Trial" under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59. [Dkt. #67]. The Motion was filed November 22, 2010, and in fact seeks Reconsideration of the Court's Order Granting the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, dated October 26, 2010 [Dkt. #66].

Under Local Rule 7, Motions for Reconsideration are to be filed within ten judicial days of the Order at issue. The Motion is therefore untimely. Additionally, Motions for Reconsideration are disfavored, and will ordinarily be denied absent a showing of manifest error, or a new factual or legal basis which could not have been raised earlier. Local Rule 7(h). This standard has not been met in this case, and the Court will not reconsider its prior ruling [Dkt. #66].

It is ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for a New Trial [Dkt. #67] is DENIED.

Dated 1st day of December, 2010.