Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

STATE v. WILSON

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Feb 8, 2011

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Brett Wilson appeals from a criminal judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of harassment. On appeal, Wilson argues insufficient evidence exists to support the guilty verdict. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner