IN RE ANDREW GETREU

Ordered that the order dated March 8, 2010, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

One who seeks a change in visitation is not automatically entitled to a hearing but must make a sufficient evidentiary showing of a material change of circumstances to warrant a hearing ( see Matter of Collazo v Collazo, 78 AD3d 1177; Matter of Reilly v Reilly, 64 AD3d 660; Matter of Rodriguez v Hangartner, 59 AD3d 630, 630-631; Matter of Perez v Sepulveda, 51 AD3d 673; Matter of Walberg v Rudden, 14 AD3d 572). Contrary to the father's contention, the Family Court properly denied, without a hearing, his motion to modify the "final modified order of parenting time" ( see Matter of Collazo v Collazo, 78 AD3d 1177; Matter of Reilly v Reilly, 64 AD3d at 660; Matter of Rodriguez v Hangartner, 59 AD3d at 630-631; Matter of Perez v Sepulveda, 51 AD3d at 673; Matter of Walberg v Rudden, 14 AD3d at 572).