- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
BRENNER v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP
United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.
Apr 18, 2011
ORDER
J. JOYNER, District Judge
AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2011, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 22), and all documents filed in support thereof and in opposition thereto, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. As to Plaintiff's claims based on the nature and size of ballast used for track stability, support, and drainage, Defendants' Motion is GRANTED and judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff.
2. As to Plaintiff's remaining claims, Defendants' Motion is DENIED.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.