Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

BRENNER v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.
Apr 18, 2011
ORDER

J. JOYNER, District Judge

AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2011, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 22), and all documents filed in support thereof and in opposition thereto, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. As to Plaintiff's claims based on the nature and size of ballast used for track stability, support, and drainage, Defendants' Motion is GRANTED and judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff.
2. As to Plaintiff's remaining claims, Defendants' Motion is DENIED.