- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
U.S. v. DIEP VU HO
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
May 2, 2011
PER CURIAM:
Raymond A. Pierson, appointed counsel for Diep Vu Ho in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issue of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ho's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.