PEOPLE v. PADRO

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

May 17, 2011

Judgment

CaseIQ

Important Paras

Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant failed to demonstrate that certain mitigating factors existed warranting a downward departure from his presumptive risk level two designation. Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in designating him a level two sex offender ( see People v Lee, 77 AD3d 897, 898; People v Donaldson, 66 AD3d 749, 750; People v Williams, 49 AD3d 518; cf. People v Abdullah, 31 AD3d 515, 516).