KUKIC v. GRAND

The motion court correctly found that Drs. Colucci and Amilo established their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by submitting medical experts' affidavits opining that their treatment of plaintiff Biber Kukic comported with good and accepted medical practice, and that Kukic's jump from a window while under one-to-one supervision was neither foreseeable nor proximately caused by any departures or deviations in the standard of care by either doctor.

As there is no liability for plaintiffs injuries against Colucci, Amilo, and the other physician defendants previously dismissed from this action, there can be no vicarious liability for plaintiffs injuries against the hospital ( Lopez v Master, 58 AD3d 425, citing Magriz v St. Barnabas Hosp., 43 AD3d 331, lv denied in part and dismissed in part 10 NY3d 790; Bertini v. Columbia Presbyt. Med. Ctr, 279 AD2d 492). In any event, the opinions in plaintiff's expert's affirmation identifying the manner in which the hospital staff deviated from good and accepted medical practice are speculative and wholly unsupported by the record ( see DeFilippo v. New York Downtown Hosp., 10 AD3d 521).

We have considered the remaining arguments and find them unavailing.