- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
IN RE HABERMAN
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Jun 14, 2011
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Under the circumstances, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the motion to disqualify the firm of Meyer, Suozzi, English Klein, PC, as cocounsel for the respondents/defendants ( see Kassis v Teacher's Ins. Annuity Assn., 93 NY2d 611; Solow v Grace Co., 83 NY2d 303; M.A.C. Duff, Inc. v ASMAC, LLC, 61 AD3d 828; Columbus Constr. Co., Inc. v Petrillo Bldrs. Supply Corp., 20 AD3d 383).
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.