Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

IN RE HAKEEM JEFFRIES

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.
Jun 16, 2011
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Malone Jr., J.

In December 2010, petitioners commenced this proceeding seeking to annul a determination of respondent Commissioner of Education that Cathleen Black was an "exceptionally qualified person[]" (Education Law § 3003; see 8 NYCRR 80-3.10 [b] [3]) eligible to receive a superintendent's certificate — also known as a school district leader certificate — which she needed to serve as Chancellor of the New York City Public Schools ( see Education Law § 3003). Supreme Court dismissed the petition and petitioners appeal.

Given that Cathleen Black resigned from her position as Chancellor in April 2011, this proceeding no longer involves a determination of "the rights of persons which are actually controverted in a particular case pending before [any] tribunal" ( Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 713). Therefore, this proceeding must be dismissed as moot. Because we are not persuaded that the issue presented in this appeal has a sufficient likelihood of repetition and is a phenomenon typically evading review ( see id. at 714-715), we do not agree with petitioners that the exception to the mootness doctrine applies.

This Court may take judicial notice of matters of public record ( see e.g. Matter of Siwek v Mahoney, 39 NY2d 159, 163 n 2 [1976]).

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.