Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

MORROW v. ASTRUE

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville.
Jul 1, 2011
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION

THOMAS PHILLIPS, Magistrate Judge

This Social Security appeal is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R R") filed by United States Magistrate Judge H. Bruce Guyton [Doc. 14]. There have been no timely objections to the R R [Doc. 14], and enough time has passed since the filing of the R R [Doc. 14] to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

After a careful review of this matter, the Court is in complete agreement with the magistrate judge's conclusion that the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 12] be GRANTED, and that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 8] be DENIED. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the R R [Doc. 14] under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

It is ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the R R [Doc. 14], which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling, that the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 12] is GRANTED, and that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 8] is DENIED. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.