- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. HARRIS
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Jul 5, 2011
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
Contrary to the contentions of the defendant, who had not yet completed his originally imposed sentences of imprisonment when he was resentenced, his resentencing to a term including the statutorily required periods of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law ( see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 630-632; People v Burgos, 84 AD3d 975).
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.