IN RE ZEMAN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Jul 12, 2011

Judgment

CaseIQ

Important Paras

Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the father's contention, there is no evidence that the Supreme Court was biased against him and deprived him of a fair hearing ( see Matter of Richardson v Richardson, 80 AD3d 32, 44; Matter of Jeannie B. v Roger D., 33 AD3d 994). Moreover, the record supports the Supreme Court's determination that the mother did not violate the prior order of visitation ( see Matter of Sinnott-Turner v Kolba, 60 AD3d 774; Matter of Perez v Sepulveda, 54 AD3d 347).