King v. Advance America Cash Advance Centers, Inc.

Michael M. Baylson

AND NOW, on this 31st day of August, 2011, the Court's Order (King, ECF No. 76; Johnson, ECF No. 86) entered on August 18, 2011 is hereby amended as follows: Numbered paragraph 2. is amended to read as follows:

2. To the extent Pennsylvania law would require the availability of class-wide arbitration in these cases, the Federal Arbitration Act preempts Pennsylvania law. See AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740 (2011); Litman v. Cellco P'ship, _____ F.3d _____ , 2011 WL 3689015 (3d Cir. Aug. 24, 2011);

All other provisions of the Order remain in full force and effect.

BY THE COURT:

Lawrence F. Stengel for

Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J.

A:\Johnson - Revised Order re Discovery & Arbitration - FINAL.wpd