Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Underland v. Alter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 9, 2011

CYNTHIA M. RUFE

CIVIL ACTION

ORDER

AND NOW, this 9th day of September 2011. in accordance with the foregoing reasons, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1) The Advanta Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART. For the reasons set forth in the accompanying opinion. Plaintiffs have not sufficiently alleged that the following misstatements are actionable: (1) Advanta's predictions about the likelihood of an early amortization event; (2) its assessment of its capital levels as '"strong:" (3) alleged misstatements and omissions about Advanta's commitment to maintaining and strengthening customer relationships, and; (4) descriptions of Advanta's methodology for accessing and monitoring customer creditworthiness: and.
2) KFMG LLP's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED: and.
3) Plaintiffs are granted leave to amend their Complaint on or before October 9, 2011.


It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

HON. CYNTHIA M. RUFE