Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

United States v. Hernandez-Perez

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 15, 2012

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Before: CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Javier Hernandez-Perez appeals from the 33-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Hernandez-Perez contends that the district court failed to recognize its authority to reject the illegal reentry Guideline's prior-conviction sentencing enhancement on policy grounds. The record belies this contention. The district court considered Hernandez-Perez's policy and other mitigation arguments, recognized that the Guidelines are advisory, imposed a sentence that was 24 months below the advisory Guidelines range, and found the circumstances insufficient to justify a shorter sentence. See United States v. Ayala-Nicanor, 659 F.3d 744, 752-53 (9th Cir. 2011).

Hernandez-Perez's contention that his prior conviction for making a criminal threat, in violation of section 422 of the California Penal Code, is not categorically a crime of violence is foreclosed. See United States v. Villavicencio-Burruell, 608 F.3d 556, 563 (9th Cir. 2010).

AFFIRMED.