Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Cooper v. Montgomery Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 28, 2015

JUDGE WALTER H. RICE

JUDGE WALTER H. RICE DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF #72); OVERRULING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (DOC. #68) AS MOOT

Based on the reasoning and citations of authority set forth by United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman, in his August 11, 2015, Report and Recommendation (ECF #72), as well as on a thorough de novo review of this Court's file and the applicable law, the Court ADOPTS said judicial filing in its entirety. Although the parties were notified of their right to file Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no Objections have been filed within the time allotted.

Given that Plaintiff has filed a Second Amended Complaint (ECF #73), the Court OVERRULES AS MOOT Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF #68), which is directed at the First Amended Complaint (ECF #27). Date: August 28, 2015

/s/_________


WALTER H. RICE


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE