- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
Smith v. Correct Care Solutions
By: Elizabeth K. Dillon United States District Judge
By: Elizabeth K. Dillon United States District Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINIONBrandon Smith, an inmate proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against "Correct Care Solutions." Having reviewed the complaint, the court concludes that it must be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c)(1).
To state a cause of action under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege facts indicating that he has been deprived of rights guaranteed by the Constitution or laws of the United States and that this deprivation resulted from conduct committed by a person acting under color of state law. West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988). Smith makes no allegation against the named defendant and "[s]ection 1983 will not support a claim based on a respondeat superior theory of liability." Polk Cnty. v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 325 (1981) (citing Monell v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 694 (1978)). By order entered July 11, 2016, the court advised Smith that the complaint failed to state a claim and gave him the opportunity to amend it. Smith did not respond. Accordingly, the court finds that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and, therefore, dismisses the complaint without prejudice.
Entered: August 1, 2016.
/s/
Elizabeth K. Dillon
United States District Judge
Alert