Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Flemming v. King

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 21, 2016
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge

APPEARANCES: WOODROW FLEMMING
Plaintiff pro se

P.O. Box 146
New York, NY 10039 HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
Attorney General for the State of New York

The Capital
Albany, NY 12224-0341 OF COUNSEL: ORIANNA CARRAVETTA, ESQ.
Assistant Attorney General DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER




Pro se plaintiff Woodrow Flemming brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 20, 2016, the Honorable Christian F. Hummel, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted in part and denied in part. See ECF No. 37. Defendants have filed timely objections and plaintiff has filed a response. See ECF Nos. 39, 40.

Based upon a de novo review of the Report-Recommendation, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Therefore, it is ORDERED that:

1. Defendants Matthew J. King and David Bilow's motion for dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 32) of plaintiff Woodrow Flemming's complaint (ECF No. 1) is:

(a) GRANTED as to the Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against defendants King and Bilow; and
(b) DENIED as to the First Amendment retaliation claims against defendants King and Bilow; and


2. The Clerk serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________


United States District Judge Dated: September 21, 2016


Utica, New York