Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Three Pirates, LLC v. Shelton Bros., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Nov 1, 2016

BROWN, Judge.

ORDER

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge John Jelderks issued Findings and Recommendation (#20) on September 27, 2016, in which he recommends this Court grant Plaintiff's Motion (#7) to Remand; deny Plaintiff's Motion (#7) for Attorney's Fees and Costs; and deny as moot the Motion (#5) to Transfer or, in the Alternative, to Stay of Defendant Shelton Brothers, Inc. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. See Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9 Cir. 2009). See also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9 Cir. 2003)(en banc). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings and Recommendation (#20). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion (#7) to Remand; DENIES Plaintiff's Motion (#7) for Attorney's Fees and Costs; DENIES as moot Shelton Brothers's Motion (#5) to Transfer or, in the Alternative, to Stay; and REMANDS this matter to the Multnomah County Circuit Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 1 day of November, 2016.

/s/ Anna J. Brown


ANNA J. BROWN


United States District Judge