Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Taylor v. Mdoc Case Manager Johnson Area 3 Smci

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 18, 2016
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

F. Keith Ball UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on its sua sponte motion to dismiss this cause of action because of plaintiff's failure to prosecute his claims. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Energy Gathering, Inc., 2 F.3d 1397, 1407 (5th Cir. 1993)(citing Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962)(a district court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to prosecute)). Plaintiff has failed to respond to an Order to Show Cause entered September 28, 2016, and requiring a response by October 28, 2016. By failing to respond to the Order to Show Cause, Taylor has failed to prosecute this case. For these reasons, the undersigned recommends that plaintiff's claims be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

The parties are hereby notified that failure to file written objections to the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation contained within this report and recommendation within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy shall bar that party, except upon grounds of plain error, from attacking on appeal the unobjected-to proposed factual findings and legal conclusions accepted by the district court. 28 U.S.C. ยง636, Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996).

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, this the 18 day of November, 2016.

/s/ F. Keith Ball


UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE