- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
Peterson v. Barksdale
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION
Mar 31, 2017
By: Robert S. Ballou United States Magistrate Judge
FINAL ORDERBy: Robert S. Ballou United States Magistrate Judge
In accordance with the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ADJUDGED AND ORDERED as follows:
1. Peterson's motion for leave to file an amended complaint, motion for default judgment, and motion for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 16, 23, and 33) are DENIED;
2. Defendants' motion for protective order and motion for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 17 and 28) are GRANTED; Peterson's claims for monetary damages concerning his religious diet are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as without merit; and his other claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1997e(a) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies before filing this action; and
3. The clerk shall STRIKE this action from the active docket of the court.
Enter: March 31, 2017
/s/
Robert S. Ballou
United States Magistrate Judge
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.