Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Sahadevan.R v. MR.KANI.S

Kerala High Court
Jun 18, 2025

OP(Crl.) NO.162 of 2023

2025:KER:44898

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE 2025 / 28TH JYAISHTA, 1947

OP(CRL.) NO. 162 OF 2023

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.55 OF 2011 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -III,

MAVELIKKARA ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.55 OF 2011 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -III,

MAVELIKKARA

PETITIONER/S:

SAHADEVAN.R

AGED 67 YEARS, S/O.RAGHAVAN, 'LEKSHMI NIVAS'

KALLIMEL.P.O., MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT,

PIN - 690509

BY ADVS.

SHRI.G.HARIHARAN

SRI.PRAVEEN.H.

SMT.K.S.SMITHA

SRI.V.R.SANJEEV KUMAR

SHRI.GENTLE C.D.

RESPONDENT/S:

1 MR.KANI.S

AGED 68 YEARS

S/O.SURA, 'ANISH VILLAH', KALLIMEL.P.O.,

1

2

MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 690509

2 THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR)

KOTTANADU, OLD MAVELIKKARA, MAVELIKARA,

ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 690101

3 THE VILLAGE OFFICER

THAZHAKKARA VILLAGE, THAZHAKKARA, ALAPPUZHA

DISTRICT, PIN - 690102

4 STATE OF KERALA

REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH

COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031

BY ADV.:

SR PP, SMT SEETHA S

THIS OP (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

18.06.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE

FOLLOWING:

3

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.

------------------------------------------- OP(Crl.) No.162 of 2023

-------------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of June, 2025

JUDGMENT

This Original Petition(Crl.) is filed with the following prayers:

"(i) Direct the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-III, Mavelikkara to recall Exhibit.P3 warrant issued against the petitioner directing payment of Rs.10,37,500/-

(ii) Restrain the respondents 2 and 3 against the petitioner under the Revenue Recovery Act against the provisions stipulated u/s 357(1)(b) of Criminal Procedure Code.

(iii) Petitioner may be permitted to dispense with the filing of translation of the vernacular documents.

And

4

(iv) To pass such other orders or reliefs as deemed fit in the interest of justice."

2. The petitioner was convicted and sentenced by the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court- III, Mavelikkara under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The same was confirmed in appeal and in revision. Thereafter, the petitioner undergone the default sentence for non-payment of the fine/compensation amount. Subsequently, Ext.P3 warrant for recovery of fine was issued from the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Alappuzha. Aggrieved by the same, this Original Petition is filed.

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. Even though notice is served to the 1strespondent, it is returned with an endorsement "not known". The way in which this Original Petition is going to be disposed of, I think, further notice is not necessary to

5

the 1strespondent.

4. When this Original Petition came up for consideration on 09.03.2023, this Court passed the following order:

"Admit. Issue notice to the 1strespondent through speed post. Learned Government Pleader takes notice for respondents 2 to 4.

In execution of the distress warrant, the revenue authorities shall not attach any property, other than the immovable properties owned and possessed by the petitioner."

5. It is settled that even if the petitioner undergone the default sentence, the recovery proceedings can continue in the light of the judgment of the Apex Court in Kumaran v. State of Kerala and Another [2017 (2) KHC 929. Moreover, Ext.P3 proceedings is issued to realize the amount of fine as arrears of land revenue from the movable or

6

immovable property. I think, the interim order passed by this Court can be retained and I make it clear that the authority concerned can proceed in accordance with law, if there is any immovable property.

Therefore, this Original Petition(Crl.) is disposed of with the following directions:

1. The interim order dated 09.03.2023 is retained and the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-III, Mavelikkara can proceed against the immovable property, if any, in the name of the petitioner, in accordance with law.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

nvj JUDGE