Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

SUHAS NANDAN v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

Kerala High Court
Jun 17, 2025

WP(C) NO. 18438 OF 2025

2025:KER:43218

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE 2025 / 27TH JYAISHTA, 1947

WP(C) NO. 18438 OF 2025

PETITIONER:

SUHAS NANDAN

AGED 37 YEARS

S/O. NANDAKUMAR, VAZHAPPULLY HOUSE, VALAPPAD P.O., THRISSUR, PIN - 680567

BY ADVS.

SMT.FARHANA K.H.

SHRI.MUHASIN K.M.

RESPONDENTS:

1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

FIRST FLOOR, CIVIL STATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR, PIN -

680003

2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER

THRISSUR REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, FIRST FLOOR, CIVIL

STATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR, PIN - 680003

3 THE TAHSILDAR

CHAVAKKAD TALUK OFFICE, VANJIKADAVU ROAD, CHAVAKKAD,

THRISSUR, PIN - 680506

4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER

VALAPPAD VILLAGE OFFICE, EDAMUTTOM P.O., VALAPPAD,

THRISSUR, PIN - 680568

GP SMT DEEPA V

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

17.06.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

1

2

C.S.DIAS, J.

--------------------------------------- WP(C) No.18438 of 2025

----------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of June, 2025

JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed to direct the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P3 application filed in Form 6 under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).

2. The petitioner is the owner in possession of 1 hectare and 5.30 Ares of land comprised in Survey Nos.136/11-2 and 136/12 of Valappad Village, Chavakkad Taluk, Thrissur District, covered by Ext.P1 land tax receipt. The petitioner's property is a 'converted land'. However, the respondents have erroneously classified the

8.87 ares of the petitioner's property as 'paddy land' in the revenue records. In order to change the category of the

3

land in the revenue records, the petitioner has submitted Ext.P3 application before the 2nd respondent on 12.03.2025. But the same has not been considered till date. Hence, the writ petition.

3. Heard; the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. On a consideration of the facts and materials on record, especially that Ext.P3 application is pending consideration before 2ndrespondent since 12.03.2025 and the same is statutory in nature, without expressing anything on the merits of the matter, I dispose of the writ petition in the following manner:

(i) The 4threspondent is directed to submit a report before the 2ndrespondent/authorised within one month from the date of production of a copy of this judgment.

(ii) Immediately on receipt of the report from the 4threspondent, the 2ndrespondent/authorised

4

officer shall consider and dispose of Ext.P3 application, in accordance with law, and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of the report from the 4threspondent.

The writ petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/-

C.S.DIAS, JUDGE

SCB.17.06.25.