- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
Ashish Seth v. State Of U.P.
Court No. - 48
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15012 of 2014
Applicant :- Ashish Seth
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Arun Srivastava
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Virendra Vikram Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate and
perused the record.
It has been argued that the robbery was committed by three miscreants, who were
covering their faces. The only evidence against the applicant is the confession of the co-
accused coupled with the recovery of ornaments on 27.1.2014.
On behalf of the applicant false implication has been pleaded. There does not exist any
previous criminal antecedent against the applicant.
Learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that a fit
case for bail is made out.
Let the applicant Ashish Seth be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and
two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned in Case
Crime No.15 of 2014, under Sections 392, 411, 120B, IPC, Police Station Kerakat,
District Jaunpur with the following conditions:-
(1) That the applicant shall cooperate in the expeditious disposal of the trial and shall
regularly attend the Court unless inevitable;
(2) That the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or
promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from
disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;
(3) That after his release, the applicant shall not involve in any criminal activity.
Order Date :- 14.5.2014
T. Sinha
Neutral Citation No. - 2014:AHC:85196
Alert