- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
RAJ KAMAL v. UNION OF INDIA
3/8/24, 1:21 PM cis.cgat.gov.in/catlive/internal/order_content_view.php?no=24642
https://cis.cgat.gov.in/catlive/internal/order_content_view.php?no=24642 1/1
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
Order Sheet Item no.: 5 O.A./261/2021 (LUCKNOW) [ PENSION ] [ SENIOR CITIZEN ] With M.A./672/2023 Court No.: 1
No of Adjournment: 23
Order Dated: 07/03/2024
RAJ KAMAL Vs
UNION OF INDIA
For Applicant(s) Advocate : NONE
For Respondent(s) Advocate : PRAYAGMATI GUPTA
Notes of The Registry Order of The Tribunal
Matter taken up in the revised list.
None present on behalf of the applicant to press the OA.
Heard learned counsel for the respondents and perused the records.
Perusal of order-sheet reveals that this OA was listed on 09.02.2024, on that day also applicant was absent.
Today also none present on behalf of the applicant to press the OA, hence, it appears that applicant is not interested in prosecution of the OA.
In view of above, the OA is dismissed for want of prosecution.
MAs pending, if any, also stand disposed of.
JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR OJHA MEMBER (J)
/JNS/
Alert